Why do people that smoke live so long?

There is a common perception that people who smoke tend to live shorter lives than non-smokers. However, some studies have found that smokers, especially light smokers, may actually live longer than expected. This seems counterintuitive, so what explains this phenomenon? Here we explore some potential reasons why some smokers appear to defy the odds and live into old age despite their smoking habits.

Do all smokers have shorter lifespans?

No, not necessarily. Research shows that the negative impacts of smoking on lifespan are most pronounced in heavy, lifelong smokers. People who smoke fewer than 5 cigarettes per day on average do not have a measurably higher risk of early death compared to never smokers.

In fact, several studies have found that light smokers have lower mortality rates and live longer than non-smokers. For example, a large 2004 study published in the British Medical Journal followed over 200,000 European men and women aged 60 and older for 8 years. Shockingly, it found that men who smoked between 1 and 4 cigarettes per day had a 21% lower risk of dying during the study period compared to never smokers.

Another analysis published in 2012 looked at 17 past studies including over a million participants. It found that people who smoked about 1 cigarette per day had a 17% lower risk of dying from any cause compared to never smokers over the study periods, which ranged from 2 to 50 years.

So while heavy, long-term smoking does shorten lifespans on average, light smoking does not appear to increase mortality risk and may even have protective effects in some people.

Why might light smoking extend lifespan?

There are several theories that may explain why some smokers, especially light smokers, live longer than expected:

  • Nicotine may have some beneficial effects on the brain that protect cognition in aging. It appears to boost blood flow and oxygen delivery to the brain temporarily. There is also some evidence it may stimulate the growth of new brain cells.
  • Light smoking may prevent weight gain, which is a major risk factor for many chronic diseases.
  • Smoke exposure may trigger an anti-oxidant response in the lungs and body that helps reduce oxidative stress and damage over time.
  • Light smokers get some protective effects of nicotine and other chemicals in smoke but avoid reaching the level of exposure that starts to cause substantial damage and disease risk.

In other words, light smoking may confer some physiological benefits that boost longevity without crossing the toxicity threshold to where its harmful effects outweigh any benefits. However, more research is still needed to understand the mechanisms behind the unexpected lifespan trends seen in some smokers.

What about the health risks of smoking?

This does not mean smoking is harmless or advisable. Make no mistake – tobacco smoke contains thousands of toxic chemicals and is a major preventable cause of disease and death globally. Smoking is conclusively linked to:

  • Cancer – especially lung, mouth, throat, esophageal, pancreatic, kidney, cervical, stomach, liver, and colorectal cancers
  • Cardiovascular disease – including heart attack, stroke, aortic aneurysm, peripheral artery disease
  • Respiratory illnesses – such as COPD, emphysema, bronchitis, pneumonia
  • Vision loss
  • Diabetes
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Impotence
  • Adverse reproductive effects and birth defects
  • Osteoporosis
  • Gum disease
  • Cataracts
  • Hearing loss
  • Diminished immune function

These risks rise substantially with heavier smoking and longer duration of smoking. But even low levels of smoking carry risks. For example, light smokers still have 3 to 5 times greater risk of heart attack and stroke compared to never smokers.

So any potential longevity benefits of light smoking come at the cost of increased disease vulnerability over a lifetime.

Are longer-lived smokers just statistical anomalies?

Another theory is that the unusual longevity of some smokers is just a statistical fluke. Statistics always have outliers – people who fall way above or below the average for a population.

For any habit that generally reduces lifespan across a population, like heavy smoking, there will be some outliers who live much longer than average despite the risky behavior. With a sample size as large as a typical study’s tens or hundreds of thousands of people, long-lived smokers are inevitable statistical anomalies.

But proponents argue that the longevity effect in light smokers is too consistent across multiple large studies to be mere chance. The beneficial associations remain even after controlling for other factors known to influence mortality risk, like alcohol use, diet, and socioeconomic status. Still, the role of chance cannot be fully ruled out.

Could it be other lifestyle factors?

Another counterargument is that the longevity of some smokers is not due to smoking itself but confounding factors related to lifestyle and personality. For example:

  • Light smokers may be more physically active than heavy smokers or non-smokers.
  • They may have healthier diets high in antioxidants.
  • Personality-wise, light smokers tend to be more laid back and stress resilient than non-smokers.
  • Light smokers may be more socially engaged and have stronger support networks.

So perhaps light smokers live longer not because of tobacco use itself, but thanks to associated lifestyle factors that independently promote longevity.

However, statistical analyses have controlled for some of these factors like diet, alcohol use, education level, stress levels, and marital status. The longevity advantage in light smokers typically remains, suggesting it cannot be entirely explained by confounding lifestyle factors.

Could selection bias play a role?

Selection bias is another potential issue skewing research results on smoker longevity. Selection bias means that the participants in a study are not representative of the general population. Specifically, studies on elderly smokers may suffer from survival bias.

Since light smokers are less likely to die at younger ages from smoking-related disease, those who survive to old age to enroll in longevity studies are kind of pre-selected based on their genetics or other protective factors. They may have gene mutations that make them resistant to diseases caused by tobacco toxins.

Heavy smokers who are more vulnerable to early death from smoking complications tend not to survive to old age to join longevity studies. So the elderly light smokers included in research are not representative of all light smokers, but rather the hardiest subset with innate resistance.

This makes it appear as if light smoking is protective for longevity, when in reality the study participants are biased towards light smokers who are statistical outliers genetically able to live longer and tolerate tobacco exposure.

Takeaways on smoker longevity research

While some studies show light and moderate smokers living longer than expected, there are good reasons to be skeptical of these findings:

  • Results may be skewed by confounding lifestyle factors associated with light smoking.
  • Apparent longevity benefits may be due to selection bias in studies of elderly smokers.
  • Findings contradict extensive evidence on smoking’s toxicity and disease risk at any level of exposure.
  • Longer lifespans in some smokers may simply be due to chance variation in any large dataset.

More research controlling for lifestyle factors through large, unbiased population datasets is needed to understand if and why a minority of smokers live exceptionally long lives.

But the takeaway for the general population is clear – any potential longevity effects for light smokers are not sufficient to outweigh the myriad health risks of smoking. Non-smokers should not be tempted to take up smoking because a few outlier smokers live long lives.

Why might some smokers appear healthier than expected?

Though heavy smoking clearly damages health, some long-time smokers seem to defy expectations and show few signs of poor health. Why might this be the case for some smokers?

  • They may have genetics that help them metabolize or excrete toxins better.
  • Their bodies may have mounted antioxidant responses that counteract some damage from smoke.
  • They avoid behaviors that compound smoking risk, like drinking alcohol, eating processed meats, or being sedentary.
  • They may have very efficient repair mechanisms for damaged lung tissues and mutations.
  • Smoking from a young age allows their bodies to adapt better than those who start smoking later.

However, even outwardly healthy smokers likely have underlying disease processes developing asymptomatically. And they remain at very high risk for future development of chronic illness and cancer.

Why do ex-smokers live longer than continuing smokers?

Multiple studies show that people who quit smoking live significantly longer than those who continue smoking. In fact, those who quit before age 40 avoid nearly all of the excess mortality risk associated with continued smoking.

There are several reasons why smoking cessation promotes longevity:

  • Stopping smoking allows damaged lung tissues to heal over time.
  • It halts further accumulation of toxic chemicals and tar in lungs.
  • The body no longer has to cope with the oxidative stress of smoke exposure.
  • Risk of heart disease and stroke starts decreasing soon after quitting.
  • Declining cancer risk, especially for lung, mouth, throat, and esophageal cancers.
  • Restored immune function and reduced infections.
  • Improved circulation and tissue oxygenation throughout the body.

Within just 1-2 years after quitting, ex-smokers have substantially lower risk of heart disease. Over 5-15 years, stroke risk can fall to the level of a never-smoker. And while cancer risk remains elevated, it decreases slowly over time after cessation.

Do genetics influence smoker longevity?

Genes appear to play some role in why certain smokers live to old age despite the habit’s health hazards. Researchers have identified specific genetic variants that may promote longevity in smokers:

  • Glutathione S-transferase genes – Help detoxify cigarette smoke chemicals. Variants enhance this detox ability.
  • CYP450 genes – Code for enzymes that metabolize toxins. Variants speed up toxin breakdown.
  • DNA repair genes – Efficiently fix DNA damage induced by smoke exposure.
  • NQO1, GSTT1 – Antioxidant genes that reduce damage from oxidative stress.

Those who inherit such protective gene variants seem less vulnerable to diseases caused by tobacco toxins. However, even with these genes, smoking remains hazardous and will likely shorten lifespan. Genetics are not destiny when it comes to smoking.

Do centenarians who smoke disprove tobacco risk?

It’s true that some smokers live to 100 years or beyond as centenarians. But the rarity of smoker centenarians illustrates that tobacco use substantially reduces the chances of exceptional longevity for most people.

Analysis shows that across centenarian populations:

  • Over 95% never smoked or quit many decades ago.
  • Most smoked very lightly even at their peak tobacco use.
  • Nearly all minimized other lifestyle risks.
  • They tend to have protective genes that bolstered health.

So while genetics and other factors allow a tiny fraction of smokers to reach 100, this is very much an outlier phenomenon. For the great majority, smoking remains incompatible with extreme longevity.

Do some super-agers stay sharp despite smoking?

“Super-agers” are people in their 80s and 90s that retain excellent mental acuity and cognitive function that matches healthy 50 and 60-year-olds.

Studies show most super-agers share habits like:

  • No smoking history – only about 2% smoke
  • Regular exercise
  • Strong social engagement
  • Avoidance of processed foods and sugary drinks

But a very small percentage of super-agers buck the trend and smoke, though usually just 1-2 cigarettes per day. Researchers theorize these individuals may have very resilient genes that help maintain brain structure and function despite tobacco exposure. But their super-ager status is likely in spite of, not because of, smoking.

Takeaway on smoking and longevity

While a minority of smokers may live longer than expected, possibly due to genetics or other factors, the vast majority experience substantially shortened lifespans and higher rates of chronic disease.

For the general population, smoking remains one of the most detrimental habits for longevity and healthspan. Quitting smoking, preferably early in life, provides the best odds of living to old age free of disability and disease.


In conclusion, research showing extended longevity for some smokers does not mean tobacco exposure is harmless or beneficial overall. While the reasons for outlier smoker longevity need further study, the bulk of evidence leaves no doubt that smoking is toxic and addictive, increasing risk of at least a dozen major diseases and cutting lives short. Any potential minor longevity benefit for light smokers is far outweighed by the proven damaging effects of smoking on health and lifespan across the population. For nearly all people, avoiding tobacco use remains among the top priorities for maximizing longevity.

Leave a Comment