Despite the severity of the Deepwater Horizon explosion, only 11 people were killed due to a combination of factors. First and foremost, the emergency response crew acted quickly and in a coordinated manner, activating an evacuation procedure that allowed a majority of the personnel to safely leave the vessel.
In addition, the way the explosion was contained was a key part of minimizing the casualties. According to experts, the way the fire ball was contained by the main deck contained the explosion and had a big impact in terms of casualties.
Furthermore, the production manifold, where the accident occurred, was located away from the personnel, so many of the workers had already left the area before the explosion took place. Finally, basic safety protocols proved to be effective as the use of fire-resistant clothing, personal flotation devices, and extinguishing systems enabled personnel to survive the incident.
These factors all helped to significantly limit the casualties from the Deepwater Horizon accident to just 11 people.
How many people were on the Deepwater Horizon when it blew up?
On the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig, there were a total of 126 people when the explosion occurred on April 20, 2010. Of those, 11 were confirmed to have died, and 17 sustained serious injuries. The remaining 98 were reported to have made it out alive.
However, some of those people did sustain minor injuries.
Who got blamed for Deepwater Horizon?
The Deepwater Horizon oil spill, which occurred in 2010, was one of the worst ecological disasters in United States history. As a result of the catastrophic event, a lengthy legal battle has ensued and various parties have been blamed.
The most significant party to blame for the disaster is BP, the British oil and gas company that operated the Macondo well which caused the oil spill. The irresponsible actions of BP’s employees and executives in drilling the well and their inadequate safety procedures contributed to the disaster.
halliburton, the contractor that was responsible for cementing the well, has also been held responsible. The cementing procedure used by halliburton was faulty, allowing oil and gas to seep through the well and leading to the explosion.
The United States government was deemed partially responsible for the disaster as well. The Minerals Management Service, which was responsible for oversight of offshore drilling operations, had weakened oversight regulations in the years leading up to the Deepwater Horizon spill.
Additionally, the government had failed to keep up with advances in technology which would have allowed more effective monitoring and safety procedures for offshore drilling.
In the end, all of the parties involved in the disaster, including BP, halliburton, and the federal government, shared responsibility for the catastrophic event that resulted in the death of 11 workers, the creation of an immense oil spill, and severe ecological damage throughout the region.
Did Mr Jimmy survive deepwater?
No, sadly Mr Jimmy did not survive Deepwater. He was involved in a tragic accident near the end of the story, where he became trapped in the leg of the fallen derrick on the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig.
Although the rest of the crew was rescued, Mr Jimmy was not able to be saved and ultimately passed away from his injuries. This proved to be a devastating loss for the crew, as Mr Jimmy was well-liked and respected by all of them.
The disaster of Deepwater Horizon and the loss of Mr Jimmy made a lasting impact on the oil rig and the industry as a whole.
Was Mr Jimmy in the shower?
No, Mr Jimmy was not in the shower. He was at home, sitting on his couch watching television. He had just come home from work and it was almost time for dinner. He had just taken his work clothes off and changed into a comfortable pair of shorts and a t-shirt.
He was planning on taking a shower later that night, when he was done relaxing and winding down.
Did BP apologize for the oil spill?
Yes, BP apologized for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill that occurred in April of 2010 in the Gulf of Mexico. In a statement, BP apologized for the environmental and economic damage that had been caused.
They accepted responsibility for their role in the incident and for their failure to contain the spill quickly, which led to a prolonged environmental disaster. BP has also taken responsibility for the economic losses that have been suffered in the Gulf and taken actions to address some of the financial and legal issues associated with the incident.
They have set up a $20 billion compensation fund and have provided assistance to states, businesses, and individuals that were impacted by the spill. Finally, they have invested in research and technology to support additional efforts to prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future.
Were the Deepwater Horizon survivors compensated?
Yes, the Deepwater Horizon survivors were compensated. BP, the company responsible for the 2010 Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explosion that caused what became known as the largest marine oil spill in history, agreed to pay around $20 billion in settlements and penalties.
The settlements include compensation for lost wages and economic losses to thousands of individuals and businesses harmed by the spill. The settlement amount is the largest of its kind in US history.
BP’s total expected payments to victims are estimated to be as high as $65 billion. Those payments are administered by the Gulf Coast Claims Facility (GCCF) which provides payments for individuals, businesses and other organizations for financial loss and damages due to the oil spill.
In addition, the settlement provides for individual payments to compensate individuals affected by the spill. These include payments of up to $60 thousand per person for lost wages, including back pay and up to $250 thousand for mental health counseling for those affected emotionally.
BP has set aside billions of dollars to compensate people and businesses that have suffered damages from the oil spill. Many survivors have chosen to take cash settlements in lieu of pursuing further legal action against BP.
Is BP still paying for Deepwater Horizon?
Yes, BP is still paying for the Deepwater Horizon disaster. The company has so far paid out more than $65 billion in fines, clean-up costs, and settlements with individuals, businesses, and local governments affected by the disaster.
That amount is likely to continue growing as BP responds to ongoing claims, investigations, and court proceedings related to the spill. In addition, BP has agreed to pay up to $18. 7 billion in additional penalties and damages, which are still pending final approval by a federal court.
With the cost of Deepwater Horizon continuing to grow, BP is committed to restoring the Gulf Coast for the communities and businesses that were impacted.
Did anyone serve jail time for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill?
Yes, a former BP engineer, Kurt Mix, was sentenced to serve time in prison for the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. In 2013, Mix was found guilty on one count of obstruction of justice for deleting over 300 text messages that contained information related to BP’s estimate of the amount of oil being released during the spill.
He was sentenced to serve two years in prison and was ordered to pay a $50,000 fine.
In addition, several BP employees were charged with criminal negligence in connection with the spill. BP drilling engineer, Robert Kaluza, and his supervisor, Donald Vidrine, were indicted on charges of involuntary manslaughter and negligence.
The involuntary manslaughter charges related to the 11 workers who were killed in the initial explosion on the Deepwater Horizon and the negligence charges were related to the oil spill. Both were acquitted on the involuntary manslaughter charges and were found guilty of the negligent charges.
Kaluza was fined $20,000 and was placed on two years’ probation and Vidrine was fined $50,000 and was placed on four years’ probation.
Does Jimmy Harrell still work for Transocean?
No, Jimmy Harrell is no longer employed by Transocean. He retired from the company in 2010 after having worked there for 43 years. Since then, he has become a safety consultant, consultant for maritime safety, and speaker for various industry groups.
He has also written books, given speeches, and produced documentaries about the Deepwater Horizon tragedy, held seminars about maritime safety, and testified before Congress regarding drilling regulations.
He continues to be vocal in promoting safety in the oil industry, and has become well-known for his tenacity and commitment to protecting the environment.
Is Deepwater Horizon still leaking?
No, the Deepwater Horizon oil spill is no longer leaking. It happened in 2010 and was the largest marine oil spill in history. The Deepwater Horizon was an off-shore oil drilling rig located off the coast of Louisiana and owned by BP.
On April 20th, a blowout occurred causing an explosion and the release of millions of barrels of crude oil into the Gulf of Mexico. An extensive clean-up effort was immediately implemented, and within 3 months the well was finally secured and the flow of oil stopped.
Subsequent studies concluded that the majority of the leaked oil had been completely cleared from the environment by natural processes. Although traces of oil can still be found, the Deepwater Horizon is no longer leaking and is no longer considered an environmental hazard.
Was Deepwater Horizon a human error?
Yes, the Deepwater Horizon disaster was caused by human error. The oil platform, located in the Gulf of Mexico, exploded and caused the worst oil spill in U. S. history in April 2010. The cause of the disaster was found to be faulty decisions and actions taken by the oil platform’s operators, Transocean, and its owner, BP.
When the disaster occurred, there were several studies conducted to determine the cause, including the United States Coast Guard, the United States Department of the Interior, and BP’s own investigation.
It was found that a series of technical, engineering, management, and procedural errors had taken place over the course of the project. In particular, research found that Transocean had not maintained its blowout preventer correctly and BP had made a number of decisions that put additional risks onto the project, including inadequate testing and cementing.
Additionally, several independent investigations into the incident also revealed that there were a number of human errors leading up to the disaster. They found that BP had not adequately communicated risk assessments throughout the project, senior personnel had not taken safety issues seriously, and that BP had not responded to warning signs before the explosion occurred.
Overall, the Deepwater Horizon disaster was caused by human error, and the findings of the investigations revealed that a number of decisions and actions taken by the operators and owner of the oil platform were faulty and inattentive to safety and potential risks.
Did BP cut ties with Russia?
Yes, BP has cut ties with Russia. In 2014, BP closed a 15-year joint venture with Rosneft, the state-owned Russian oil company. This shocked the oil world, as BP had previously been the largest foreign oil producer in Russia and Rosneft was the leader in the country’s oil industry.
The dissolution of the joint venture was part of a larger move by BP to focus on production in other regions, such as the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea. The decision to leave Russia was also likely due to the economic and political tensions between the West and Russia, which had already resulted in sanctions imposed on Russia by the EU and US.
BP’s CEO at the time, Bob Dudley, cited the changing fortunes of the oil industry as the main reason for the departure and noted that the company was looking for other opportunities across the globe.
How could the Deepwater Horizon been prevented?
The Deepwater Horizon disaster could have been prevented if stricter regulations had been in place and better safety protocols had been followed. For example, the well should have had a second set of safeguards to prevent blowouts.
The blowout preventer should have had multiple barriers, such as blind shear rams, that could have been triggered by a variety of factors, such as high pressure or unusual tapping. In addition, the safety and maintenance protocols of the rig should have been more strictly enforced.
The maintenance crew should have been inspected on a regular basis and any areas of concern should have been addressed. Finally, the management of the rig should have been more thorough in assessing potential risks and communicating with the crew to ensure best safety practices were being followed.
