Does Fitbit underestimate calories burned?

Fitness trackers like Fitbit have become increasingly popular in recent years. They provide users with insights into their daily activity levels, sleep patterns, and calorie expenditure. However, some users have raised concerns that Fitbit and similar devices may underestimate the number of calories burned during exercise.

Table of Contents

How Fitbit calculates calories burned

Fitbit uses proprietary algorithms to estimate calorie expenditure based on a user’s heart rate, age, sex, height, and weight. Sensors in the tracker monitor heart rate continuously and use this data, along with the personalized user profile, to estimate calories burned.

Specifically, Fitbit’s formula for calculating calories burned is:

Calories Burned = Average Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) x Weight in Kilograms x Duration in Minutes x (Heart Rate / Average Resting Heart Rate)

MET values represent the energy cost of various activities compared to resting metabolism. For example, sitting has a MET value of 1-1.5 while running may have a MET of 7-10. The more intense the activity, the higher the MET value. Fitbit maintains a database of MET values for different exercises.

Heart rate data is used to further personalize the estimates. A higher heart rate relative to your resting rate indicates greater exertion and thus more calories burned.

Accuracy of Fitbit for measuring calories burned

Research indicates Fitbit provides relatively accurate estimates for lighter activities like walking but tends to underestimate calorie expenditure during more intense workouts:

A 2018 study in adults doing treadmill walking and running found Fitbit Charge 2 underestimated calorie burn by an average of 27% during the run compared to indirect calorimetry as the gold standard measurement.
A 2016 study found Fitbit Surge underestimated calorie burn during outdoor running by about 17% compared to a portable metabolic analyzer.

However, a 2017 study in obese adolescents found no significant difference between Fitbit Flex estimates and indirect calorimetry for light walking.

Potential reasons Fitbit underestimates calorie burn during intense exercise include:

Inaccurate heart rate monitoring – Fitbit uses heart rate algorithms that may not keep up with rapidly changing heart rates during intense intervals or weight training.

Unaccounted movements – Activities like weight lifting involve a lot of upper body motion that wrist-based trackers may not detect.
Static MET values – The fixed MET values may not reflect true variabilities in energy expenditure based on differences in efficiency, terrain, etc.
Underestimation of resting metabolism – Lower resting metabolism values would underestimate overall energy expenditure.

Tips for more accurate calorie burn estimates

If you feel Fitbit is underestimating your true energy expenditure, especially for intense workouts, consider these tips:

Enter your weight and other stats accurately in the Fitbit app. Inaccuracies will skew estimates.
Wear your tracker properly during workouts – snug on the wrist several finger widths up your arm. Loose wear impacts heart rate detection.

Log specific exercises or use “Interval Training” mode for HIIT workouts to improve accuracy.
Take body measurements periodically and adjust your weight in the app as needed.
Aim to burn calories through heart-pumping exercise that engages your whole body rather than just steps.

Consider investing in a Fitbit that includes continuous SpO2 sensors for better calorie burn detection like the Charge 5.

While no device is perfect, being informed about how Fitbit estimates calories burned and the factors that influence accuracy can help you get more out of your device.

Does Fitbit underestimate total calories burned in a day?

In general, research suggests Fitbit provides relatively accurate estimates of total daily energy expenditure at rest and during light physical activities. However, some key points on whether Fitbit underestimates total daily calorie burn:

Studies show Fitbit devices provide estimates within 10% of daily expenditure as measured by double-labeled water, the gold standard method.
A 2020 meta-analysis of 8 studies found no significant difference between Fitbit trackers and reference methods for estimating total energy expenditure over a 24-hour period.
Fitbit tends to be more accurate at estimating energy burned during sedentary and light activities than moderately vigorous work.

Factors like inaccurate user stats, improper wear, and lack of logged activities can contribute to underestimation in some cases.
Fibit’s tendency to underestimate exercise calorie burn may be canceled out by overestimating BMR and incidental movement.

For most users doing moderate exercise a few times a week, Fitbit likely provides a reasonably accurate picture of total daily calorie expenditure. Those doing frequent high intensity training may experience more significant underestimation.

Does Fitbit underestimate BMR and resting calories?

Basal metabolic rate (BMR) represents the minimum number of calories the body burns at rest to maintain vital functions. Some users feel Fitbit underestimates BMR and resting calorie burn, but current research suggests otherwise:

A 2016 study of 60 adults found no significant difference between BMR measured by Fitbit Flex and indirect calorimetry.
A 2017 study comparing 7 activity trackers also found Fitbit Charge HR accurately estimated BMR against metabolic cart testing.

Fitbit uses age, sex, height, and weight to estimate BMR using standard predictive equations rather than direct measurement of resting metabolism.
These formulas may overestimate BMR in some users more than underestimating it.

Unless you have a medical condition that uniquely impacts resting metabolism, Fitbit likely provides reasonable estimates of your baseline calorie needs. But note it does not directly measure your BMR.

Does Fitbit underestimate calories from steps?

Fitbit uses your profile data and published MET values to estimate calorie expenditure from activities like walking and running. But some users feel it undercounts calories burned from steps. Some key considerations:

One study found Fitbit Blaze slightly underestimated energy expenditure during walking at 3 mph (~134 steps/min) but overestimated at 4 mph (~156 steps/min).
Fitbit may underestimate step calories at paces slower than 100 steps/min based on standard MET values.

However, Fitbit assumes 125 steps/min during logged walks. So step counts on casual strolls are unlikely underestimated.
Faster paces and increased inclines will burn more calories per step. But wrist motion may not detect variations in walking intensity.
Improperly logging walks or inaccuracies in user data like height/weight can also impact step calorie estimates.

For most users, Fitbit provides reasonable calorie estimates for casual walking. But consider logging workout walks at true duration and pace for accuracy.

Does Fitbit underestimate calories burned for strength training?

Research and user experiences suggest Fitbit significantly underestimates calorie expenditure during strength training:

A 2016 study found Fitbit Surge underestimated calorie burn during circuit weight training by 43% compared to metabolic testing.

Wrist-worn trackers cannot accurately detect upper body movements and exertion during lifting.
General MET values likely underestimate true intensity for heavier lifting sets.
Manual logging of strength workouts with accurate durations, sets, and weights can improve calorie estimates.

Optical heart rate sensors may miss rapid HR spikes and dips between sets.

If you do frequent weight lifting, considering logging these workouts manually or using a chest strap HRM for better calorie burn estimates.

Does Fitbit underestimate calories burned for HIIT workouts?

High intensity interval training (HIIT) is another workout style where Fitbit often underestimates energy expenditure:

A 2018 study found Fitbit Alta HR underestimated calorie burn during a HIIT treadmill routine by 30% compared to metabolic analyzer.
The rapidly fluctuating heart rate demands of HIIT may not be captured well by optical sensors.
Generalized MET values likely underestimate the spikes in exertion.

Upper body motions are missed for HIIT workouts involving weights or rowing.
Using the Interval Tracking mode where available can improve accuracy somewhat.

For high intensity intervals, consider a chest strap HRM if accuracy is paramount. But Fitbit still provides estimates in the right ballpark.

Does Fitbit overestimate calories burned for other activities?

While Fitbit tends to underestimate high intensity workouts, it may overestimate calorie burn for some other activities:

One study found Fitbit Flex overestimated calorie expenditure for household chores by 28-92%.
Some research suggests Fitbit overestimates energy expenditure from cycling and elliptical use.

Incidental movement like typing or fidgeting may be counted as extra calorie burn during sedentary activities.
Fitbit’s use of standard MET values likely overestimates true calorie burn for lighter activities in some people.
Higher baseline metabolism estimates could also overestimate resting calorie expenditure.

For lighter activities, take calorie estimates with a grain of salt. Fitbit likely provides more accurate tracking of step counts and distance than calories burned.

Does Fitbit accuracy vary between users?

While studies reveal general trends in Fitbit accuracy, there can be significant individual variability based on:

User stats – Inaccuracies in entered age, height, weight, and gender can skew estimates.

Device wear – Loose wristbands affect heart rate tracking which influences calorie estimates.
Activity logging – Manually logging workouts can improve accuracy over automated detection.
Body composition – Higher muscle mass and lower body fat may increase calorie burn compared to averages.

Fitness level – Better conditioning makes activities less metabolically demanding.

Calibrating your device by tracking intake vs weight changes can reveal if Fitbit aligns with your individual energy needs.

Conclusion

While no consumer device is perfectly accurate, research suggests Fitbit provides reasonable estimates of daily calorie expenditure for most users. However, the limitations of wrist-based tracking technology likely cause Fitbit to underestimate calorie burn during high-intensity exercises. Logging strenuous workouts manually, wearing the tracker properly, and choosing the right device for your needs can all help improve accuracy. But treat calorie estimates as approximations rather than gospel, using the data as motivation to get moving and make healthy choices.