Do background checks look at your phone?

When conducting a background check on a job candidate, employer, or any other individual, the types of records examiners look for often depend on the purpose and legal depth of the background check. For most basic employment background checks, examiners will not look directly at your phone or phone records without your consent.

Table of Contents

What types of records do basic background checks look at?

Most basic pre-employment background checks focus on searching public records and databases. This usually includes:

Criminal records – Any criminal convictions, arrests, warrants, etc. found in state or federal court databases.

Sex offender registries
Driving records – Any DMV records like licenses, traffic tickets, DUIs, etc.
Credit reports

Education records – Degrees, transcripts, etc. verified with schools.
Employment history – Previous employers contacted to verify titles, dates worked, etc.
Licenses and certifications – Verified through issuing organizations.

Social media – Publicly available online posts may be reviewed.

As you can see, these standard background check components focus on official documentation, not personal devices or accounts. Examiners stay within the scope of public records and databases, they do not dig into your private phone or PC.

When would a background check access phone data?

There are a few circumstances where your phone information may be accessed for a background check:

Applying for government security clearance – Government jobs requiring high-level security clearance will run extensive background checks that can include reviewing phone and computer files with your consent.
Working with sensitive data – Some financial services or technology firms that handle sensitive data may review personal devices as part of in-depth background checks.
Legal investigations – As part of a criminal investigation, law enforcement can subpoena phone records.

Public phone data – If you post phone numbers publicly linked to your name, such as on social media bios, they may be searched.

However, for standard pre-employment checks, recruiters will not look directly at your phone or phone records without informing you first.

What can background checks see on your phone?

If a background check does extend to your phone data, here are some of the things they could potentially access:

Call, text, and browsing history
Downloads and app activity
Phone contacts and communications

Location data
Stored photos, videos, files
Social media activity if apps are on your phone

Essentially, any personal or sensitive information on your phone could be open to review if phone access is allowed for the background check.

Can you refuse phone access for a background check?

For most basic pre-employment background checks, your phone records cannot be accessed without your written consent. However, for government, legal, or some corporate checks, phone access may be required to proceed. Some key points:

Always know and understand the types of background check screening required before consenting.

If asked to provide phone access for an employer check, you can inquire about necessity and privacy controls first.
For government and legal checks, refusal to provide phone access if requested can negatively impact the outcome.
For private sector jobs, you may be able to negotiate phone access if it is not explicitly required for your role.

Ultimately, your phone Privacy depends on the nature of the background check. But for most jobs, standard pre-employment screening will not require access to your personal mobile device or records.

Should you wipe your phone before a background check?

For most private-sector job background checks, your phone history will not be reviewed, so wiping your phone is unnecessary. However, if you are required to provide full access to your phone for a government, legal, or specialized corporate background check, wiping your phone could look suspicious if not already standard protocol for your phone usage and maintenance.

Can you fake a background check?

Attempting to fake a background check is not advisable and often unsuccessful. Here’s why:

Background screening companies use databases not accessible to the public. Any false records provided will not align with actual data in the system and raise red flags.
Providing fake references or identities almost always gets discovered through the screening process.
Many parts of background checks get conducted without your involvement, using databases you cannot influence.

If any aspect seems suspicious, examiners will dig deeper and expand the investigation, making deception harder to maintain.
Getting caught falsifying information leads to automatic disqualification for most positions.

While lesser forms of embellishment sometimes slip through, outright faking major parts of your background and identity often fails background verification.

Can you get someone else to take a background check for you?

Having someone pose as you for any part of a background check is fraudulent and inadvisable for similar reasons:

Photos, biometrics, SSNs, and other identifiers will likely uncover any impersonation attempts.
Your substitute will not have the deep personal history and details needed to pass as you through the full gauntlet of checks.

Any suspicion of impersonation will trigger more vigorous screening likely to unravel the deception.
Being caught substituting someone else during a background check almost always leads to disqualification and legal penalties.

Background checks are designed to verify identities and history. Faking records and impersonation are very hard to accomplish successfully without getting caught.

Can you fail a background check without knowing?

It is possible to fail a background check without being informed directly in some cases. Here’s how it happens:

The screening company reports disqualifying results to the employer, not you. The employer then rejects or dismisses you.
Laws around background check disclosures vary. Some employers are only required to inform you that you failed, not why.

Even if no official records show up, inconsistencies or lies caught through verification process can still lead employer to reject you.
Some reasons for failing like false info or impersonation may not generate definitive records that you are shown.

To avoid surprise, ask up front about the background check process and your rights. Be proactive tracking down your own records. Getting ahead of potential issues early maximizes your awareness and options.

Should you dispute a background check failure?

If you are notified or suspect you failed a background check unjustly, you should absolutely pursue a dispute. Some key steps:

Get the specific results and reasons for failure in writing from the employer or screening company.
Review the disputed information yourself immediately and tally any inaccuracies.

Send a written dispute request to the background check company per the Fair Credit Reporting Act process.
Provide your evidence of false, mistaken, or outdated information from the check to them.
Recheck your results after allotted dispute period.

Consult legal counsel if dispute is unsuccessful.

You have rights under the FCRA to dispute inaccurate or unverifiable background check findings. This rigorous process often gets falsely negative results corrected or removed.

How can you check your own background check?

Conducting your own background check enables you to know what employers will potentially see, dispute issues, and explain red flags. Options for checking your background include:

Order from screening companies – Consumer reporting agencies like HireRight, Sterling Talent Solutions, GoodHire, and many others offer background checks for personal review.
Search state/federal databases – Use government agency web portals to check records like criminal history, court cases, licenses, voter registration, etc.
Request free annual credit reports – The FCRA entitles you to one free credit report per year from Equifax, Experian, and TransUnion.

Hire a private investigator – Licensed private investigators have access to various databases and search methods individuals cannot directly access.

Self-monitoring your background routinely can help avoid nasty surprises down the line. Advanced awareness of potential red flags also allows you time to formulate explanations and backup documentation as needed.

Should you include explanations with a background check?

For any red flags uncovered in your personal background check, you may want to attach explanatory information upfront to provide context. For example:

Records of dismissal for past charges/arrests not prosecuted or resulting in acquittal.
Evidence of expunged or sealed records orders from courts.
Proof of satisfied judgments/liens, paid tax bills, or other resolved financial issues.

Letters of recommendation addressing past terminations or other disciplinary actions.
Certificates of rehabilitation or pretrial diversion programs completed.

Being proactive in disclosing and explaining any negative or confusing background history yourself helps set the record straight. This can minimize unfair assumptions and conclusions drawn in ignorance of key details and circumstances.

Conclusion

For most standard pre-employment background checks, employers do not have direct access to your phone, call records, or personal accounts without your consent. However, some roles may require more extensive screening including phone data access. Understanding clearly what any check entails before authorizing consent allows you to maintain your privacy appropriately. Running self-checks on your background routinely can also help you avoid surprises and be prepared with explanatory documentation if anything raises questions.