# How many mg makes a teaspoon?

Determining how many milligrams (mg) are in a teaspoon (tsp) is useful for measuring medications or other powdered substances. The key factors are the density and granularity of the substance being measured. While there are some general conversions that can provide a rough estimate, the exact amount can vary based on the specific compound.

As a general estimate, one teaspoon of a powdered compound is roughly equivalent to:

• 5,000 mg (or 5 grams)
• 4,200 to 6,000 mg
• 3,000 to 7,000 mg

However, the exact mg per tsp can range considerably depending on the density and granularity of the substance. Finely powdered compounds tend to have higher mg per tsp, while coarser, granular compounds have lower mg per tsp.

## Typical Range of mg per tsp

Here is a more detailed look at the typical range of milligrams per teaspoon for various compounds:

Type of Compound Mg per tsp
Finely powdered substances 4,000 – 6,000 mg
Moderately coarse powders 3,000 – 5,000 mg
Granular compounds 2,000 – 4,000 mg

As shown, finer powders like flour can contain over 6,000 mg per teaspoon, while coarse granular compounds like sugar may have closer to 2,000 – 3,000 mg per tsp. The density and packing ability of the particles makes a significant difference.

## Factors Affecting mg per tsp

There are several key factors that determine how many milligrams (mg) are contained in a teaspoon (tsp) of any particular powdered substance:

### Particle Size and Density

Smaller, denser particles can pack more tightly together. Finely powdered compounds can have densities of 0.5 g/mL or higher, allowing over 5,000 mg to fit into a teaspoon. Larger particles with more air gaps have lower densities around 0.3 – 0.4 g/mL, reducing the mg per tsp.

### Granularity and Flowability

Granular compounds with larger particles tend not to pack efficiently and have more air gaps. This lowers the density and mg per tsp compared to powders. But granules also flow more easily into a spoon.

### Packing and Settlement

Tapping or vibrating a powder after scooping can help settle it into a tighter packed state, increasing the mg per tsp. Gentle tapping against the side of a container can improve the density.

### Hygroscopicity

Some compounds are hygroscopic, meaning they absorb moisture from the air. This causes particles to stick together and pack more densely, so hygroscopic powders may have more mg per tsp than non-hygroscopic ones.

### Particle Shape

Rounded particles like sand can pack together well, while jagged and angular particles do not settle efficiently. This can affect air gaps and density.

### Compressibility

Some particles are more easily compressed together under pressure, improving density. Afirm scoop and leveling off can mildly compress a powder into a denser state.

### Solubility

Compounds that dissolve readily in water tend to have particles that pack together well. Insoluble compounds may be more granular or crystalline.

### Electrostatic Forces

Static cling between particles can influence interparticle interactions. This may increase or decrease the packing density.

## Types of Compounds

Here is a look at the typical mg per tsp for some common household items and medicinal compounds:

Substance Mg per tsp
Flour 5,000 – 6,000 mg
Powdered sugar 4,000 – 5,000 mg
Granulated sugar 2,000 – 3,000 mg
Salt 2,300 – 2,800 mg
Baking soda 3,500 – 4,500 mg
Cornstarch 3,200 – 4,000 mg
Aspirin powder 5,000 – 6,000 mg
Ibuprofen powder 4,800 – 5,600 mg

As you can see, the mg per tsp is highest for very fine uniform powders like flour and lowest for grainy compounds like granulated sugar. Medication powders tend to be very finely milled to higher densities.

## Measuring Technique

The exact milligram per teaspoon measurement can also depend on the measuring method:

• Scooping – Afirm scoop with a dry spoon reduces air gaps. Leveling off the scoop leads to more consistent volumes.
• Settling – Lightly tapping the spoon on the side of the container can settle the powder into a denser state.
• Sifting – Sifting powders breaks up clumps and improves flow into the spoon.
• Surface area – Using a spoon with a larger surface area improves powder flow into the spoon.
• Humidity – Static charge and moisture are reduced at higher humidities, improving interparticle interactions.

With care and consistency, the margin of error in mg per teaspoon can be reduced. But some variability is always expected compared to more precise weighing.

## Calculating mg per tsp

The milligrams per teaspoon can also be estimated using the formula:

mg per tsp = (density of powder in g/mL) x (volume of 1 tsp in mL)

Where:

• Density of powder is typically 0.3 to 0.7 g/mL
• 1 tsp is approximately 5 mL volume

So for example, with a density of 0.5 g/mL:

• 0.5 g/mL x 5 mL per tsp = 2.5 g per tsp
• 2.5 g x 1000 mg/g = 2500 mg per tsp

Measuring the actual density improves the accuracy of this calculation.

## Converting Between mg, g, and tsp

Since teaspoons are not highly accurate, it is often better to convert to grams or milligrams when precision is needed:

1 teaspoon (tsp) ~5,000 mg ~5 g
1 gram (g) 1,000 mg ~0.2 tsp
1 milligram (mg) 0.001 g ~0.005 tsp

So for example, to convert 10,000 mg to teaspoons:

• 10,000 mg = 10 g
• 10 g x 0.2 tsp/g = 2 tsp

Using weight measurements in grams or milligrams rather than volumetric teaspoons improves accuracy when precision is needed.

## Effects of Temperature and Humidity

Changing temperature and humidity conditions can also affect milligrams per teaspoon:

• Higher temperatures tend to reduce density slightly as particles move farther apart.
• Lower humidity reduces electrostatic attraction between particles, decreasing density.
• Dry conditions may also increase clumping as particles stick together.

So the same powder measured at different temperatures or humidity levels may yield slightly different mg per teaspoon results. Best practice is to measure under consistent conditions.

## When Accuracy Is Critical

For clinical applications or scientific research where accuracy is critical, measuring by teaspoon is not recommended. Using an analytical balance to weigh milligram quantities directly results in much more precise and consistent measurements.

In settings like pharmaceutical manufacturing or compounding pharmacies, all ingredients are carefully weighed. Relying on volumetric spoons can introduce too much variability for substances where incorrect dosages can be dangerous.

## Effects of Settling Over Time

The apparent density of a powder can change over time as particles settle. Some factors include:

• Vibration during transport can densify particles through settling.
• Sitting undisturbed allows more complete settling.
• Cycles of vibration followed by rest can gradually improve packing density.

This means powders that have recently been transported and shaken may initially measure less mg per teaspoon. After sitting 24-48 hours, the same powder may achieve a higher, more stable density.

## Summary

In summary, the key points to keep in mind when determining mg per tsp are:

• Finer powders generally have higher mg per tsp than coarse granular materials.
• Density, particle size, and interparticle forces affect packing efficiency.
• Measurement technique influences consistency and accuracy.
• Humidification, settling time, and ambient conditions matter.
• For precision, mass measurement by weight is recommended over volumetric spoons.
• Expect some inherent variability when measuring powders by volume.

With care, teaspoon measurements can be useful for approximating quantities during cooking, baking, and for non-critical applications. But understand the limitations compared to weighing when accuracy is vital.

## Conclusion

Determining milligrams per teaspoon requires an understanding of the powder’s characteristics and density, as well as measurement best practices. While there are rough averages around 5,000 mg per teaspoon, the exact quantity can vary widely for different compounds depending on particle properties, ambient conditions, settling time, and handling technique. When precision is critical, measuring by weight using a high accuracy balance is recommended over volumetric spoons. However, teaspoon measurements can provide a general approximation for non-critical applications like cooking where convenience is prioritized over absolute accuracy.